Home refrigeration and air conditioning contribute to the global warming of the planet. This is due to the fact that these appliances contain refrigerant chemical compounds called Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFC) and Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC). HFCs were considered an alternative to HCFCs, which were ozone-depleting substances (ODS).

While HFCs do not contribute to the Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP), these gases have high Global Warming Potential (GWP), meaning their use actively contributes to the worsening of this phenomenon. In Mexico, the national consumption of HFC has increased by an annual rate of 14.5% in the period from 2007 to 2017, going from 12.75 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e) to 49.43 MtCO2e. The increase in HFC is directly linked to production increase in the following sectors:

The planet’s rising temperature has meant that conserving food, medicine, and other perishables – as well as maintaining human comfort – have become critical necessities. For this reason, an additional increase to refrigeration consumption in the next few years is inevitable. This also means that the refrigeration sector is directly linked to several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

With the intention of decreasing the consumption of HFCs, the Mexican government has adopted and developed several public policy instruments, and the Montreal Protocol Unit of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), with the support of the project Sustainable and climate-friendly Phase-out of Ozone Depleting Substances (SPODS) of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, developed the National Diagnosis for the Mitigation of HFC Emissions. In addition, in November 2019, a planning workshop was held for the socialization of the Kigali Amendment and for the HFC Reduction Plan.

The diagnosis identifies mitigation actions for each one of the sectors that consume HFC. The majority are actions that involve replacing HFCs with low-GWP alternatives such as hydrocarbons and mixtures of Hydrofluoroolefins (HFO). For example, they suggest using R-600a (isobutane) in the domestic refrigeration sector, while for the commercial sector, they recommend R-290 (propane). The document also highlights the importance of implementing the recovery, recycling, and destruction of refrigerating gases.

As its primary outcome, the study proposes 11 mitigation measures that are feasible in the Mexican sectors of HFC consumption. These measures are aligned with the Kigali Amendment and can be included as part of Mexico’s conditional NDCs and contribute to the fulfillment of several SDGs. One example of the suggested measures is the substitution of HCFC-22 and R-410A with alternatives such as R-32 (difluoromethane) during the period of 2020 – 2045. It is estimated that this measure has a mitigation potential of 1.2tCO2e per substituted device, with a cost of $500 USD per device.

Making sure that these actions can be taken to an implementation phase will depend on the commitment of the government, private sector, and society itself when buying refrigeration systems that contain natural refrigerants. You can consult the diagnosis yourself to find out more details about the measures and suggestions for HFC mitigation.

With the intention of encouraging the involvement of new actors with interest in the Mexican Emissions Trading System (ETS), and in the context of the recent launch of the ETS Pilot Program on January 1, 2020, the GIZ project Preparation of an Emissions Trading System in Mexico (SiCEM) is conducting diffusion and skill development activities about the ETS for the academic sector.

On the 26th of February 2020, students from the National Polytechnic Institute (IPN) and the Mexico City campus of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (TEC) were invited to participate in the final of the inter-university tournament ¡Hasta el Tope! (“To the brim!”). This tournament aimed to familiarize university students with key concepts of an Emissions Trading System (ETS ) using the board game ¡Hasta el Tope! developed by the SiCEM project.

The tournament was made up of three rounds. The students and professors from the participating universities were responsible for the organization of the first two rounds. The Head of the Environmental Engineering Degree at IPN, the TEC Student Society of Sustainable Engineering (IDeaS), and the student organization Verde ITAM from the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM) were the facilitators of the tournament. The final round took place at the Mexican GIZ installations, and Ricardo Reyes from the IPN won first place in the Tournament.

Commenting on her experience in the tournament, Paola Carrasco, finalist from the TEC, said that university students today are very dynamic and learn through games. She asserted that, as a student, she has often observed that what is taught in the classroom is neither practiced, nor reflected in the real world. That’s what interested her about a board game that could mimic the functioning of one of the key instruments for climate policies in Mexico. Meanwhile, Luis Antonio Cano, IPN finalist, thinks it vital that these kinds of instruments communicate to university students in an entertaining way, especially since they can provide a better panorama of the country’s environmental policies for future graduates.

Ricardo Reyes added to the comments of his peers:

The Mexican government has established a social promise of providing Mexican citizens with more equality and justice. At the same time, the country has embarked on a transition to adopt sources of clean energy, which will be decisive for reducing the carbon footprint of the Mexican energy sector and enabling an ample spectrum of social and economic opportunities for the country.

In a fruitful partnership, the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, in collaboration with the Potsdam Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), have prepared a detailed evaluation that examines the important co-benefits of renewables and energy efficiency in Mexico’s energy transition, as well as options for more adequate policies in order to deliver these benefits to the Mexican people. The report is based on four case studies that took place in Baja California Sur, Mexico City, Oaxaca, and the Yucatan, which provided a significant orientation on topics of evaluation and co-benefits, and how to guarantee political relevance for the social and economic opportunities addressed.

Research partners Ithaca Environmental, as well as the Climate Initiative of Mexico (ICM), were also present during the technical implementation. This report of the Co-Benefits of Mexico has been facilitated by the Energy and Climate Change Policy Convergence (CONECC) project of GIZ and with the financial support of the International Climate Initiative (IKI).

Mexico, alongside 187 other parties to this date, ratified the Paris Agreement to tackle climate change and provide opportunities for current and future generations to prosper. With this study, we look to contribute to these international efforts, offering a scientific basis and harnessing the social and economic co-benefits in this energy transition. Building an energy system with low carbon emissions, while facilitating a fair transition, will enable successful climate action for the planet and the Mexican people.

We want to inspire readers to participate in the important debate regarding a just and sustainable energy future in Mexico.

 

 

If you would like more information, contact: gianna-maria.pedot@giz.de

Within the framework of the project Biodiversity and Sustainable Agrosilvopastoralist Livestock Landscapes (BioPaSOS), more than 1,200 livestock breeders – men and women from Jalisco, Chiapas, and Campeche in Mexico – are being trained to implement silvopastoral systems on their farms, as well as good livestock practices that can contribute to the conservation of biodiversity and the mitigation of greenhouse gases (GHGs), thus increasing their ability to adapt to climate change.

Upon implementing these technologies, they’ve been able to overcome food shortages for their livestock in dry season, increase productivity, better manage the pastures, improve the health of their animals, and – in some cases – reduce the use of agrochemicals. What’s more, by conserving and improving the management of trees on their farms, they’ve obtained benefits such as firewood, timber, fence posts, and fruits.

All of this knowledge has been transmitted to farming families through the 68 Farmer Field Schools (FFSs) developed by the project Biodiversity and Sustainable Agrosilvopastoralist Livestock Landscapes, known as BioPaSOS, alongside local partners and in coordination with the Agriculture and Environment Ministries in each territory of intervention.

“BioPaSOS has provided us with the tools to adapt. We are now putting into practice what they’ve taught us on the farm, and we can see better results in our production, as well as economic savings,” asserted Laura Madera, a producer from Jalisco.

The main practices developed during the FFSs are the establishment of hedges, tree-planting in pastures, the establishment of cut grasses, multinutrient blocs, silage, management of fodder crops, the use of biodigesters, and the production of sulphate and calcium products. They’ve also been sensitized to conserving biodiversity to increase the resilience and adaptation of livestock production to climate change; for example, the trees help to capture GHG, protect water sources, provide habitat, and increase the connectivity of the landscape, which helps to maintain the viability of plants and animal communities on farming landscapes.

Héctor Caamal, a farmer from Campeche, says the FFS changed his belief that in order to rear livestock, it was necessary to get rid of trees. He now practices a very different kind of livestock farming, keeping more animals in a smaller area – which allows the trees to grow – and implementing positive livestock practices.

BioPaSOS is implemented by the Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE), with the support of the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), in coordination with the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO) and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (SADER), with financing from the International Climate Initiative (IKI).

The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, at the request of Germany’s Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU), co-organized an event about good international verification processes for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the framework of the Emissions Trading System (ETS). This workshop took place within the project “Preparation of an Emissions Trading System in Mexico” (SiCEM) alongside the “México Economía Limpia” alliance from Stanford University and USAID. The course included the participation of experts in monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) from the European Union and California; they shared some of their challenges and learning from years of experience within their respective jurisdictions.

The course’s inauguration was presided by Professor Julio Trujillo (Undersecretary of Development and Environmental Regulation at SEMARNAT), Yutsil Sanginés Sayavedra (General Director of Climate Change Policy at SEMARNAT), Jasmin Fraatz (Coordinator of the GIZ Climate Change Cluster), Blas L. Pérez-Henríquez (Director of the “México Economía Limpia 2050” alliance) and Rosario Miranda (Assistant Director of the Certifying Agencies at EMA, the Mexican Accreditation Body). They all highlighted the importance of international cooperation in order to share good practices from countries and programs with experience in GHG verification.

The course took place from the 27th to the 31st of January 2020 and brought together participants from the Certification, Verification, and Validation Agencies (OC-VV), the Mexican Accreditation Body (EMA), the Federal Bureau of Environmental Protection (PROFEPA), and the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), among others. During five days of training, experts from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and Verico SCE updated the participants on topics such as accreditation of verifying agencies, and the revision and monitoring of verifications. Likewise, they placed emphasis on the verification processes of sectors such as energy, cement, and steel.

With this kind of training, it is expected that key actors for the Pilot Program for the Emissions Trading System – such as these verifiers – develop the skills for solid verification of GHG emissions at the participating installations.

 

Presentations at the Event (in Spanish)
Day 1

1 European Union Accreditation Process

1_2_Comparisons between Accreditation Systems

1_ Accreditation of GHG Verification Agencies: Accreditation processes in the USA and Canada

2 Accreditation: Qualification Criteria for Qualification Verifiers: EU functioning

3 Monitoring of GHG 1. Basic concepts and EU Regulations

3_Monitoring of Greenhouse Gases Comparative Monitoring Plan

3_ Reporting Protocol for the Voluntary Report Program

4 Monitoring of GEI 1: Activity details, Calculation and Uncertainty Factors

4_Monitoring of Greenhouse Gas Effects. Addressing Uncertainties

4_Reporting Protocol for the Voluntary Report Program

5 Verification Criteria. Concept and Materiality

5_ Materiality Verification Criteria

Verico SCE. Presentation of the Cooperative

Accreditation of GHG Verification Agencies: Accreditation processes in the USA and Canada

Session 3. Reporting Protocol for the Voluntary Report Program

Session 4. Reporting Protocol for the Voluntary Report Program

 

Day 2

6_10_ Accreditation of GHG Verification Organisms: Accreditation processes in the USA and Canada

6_ Verification Process. Contract revision

7_ Verification Process. Strategic Analysis and Roles

7_ Verification Process. Strategic Analysis and CoI 

7_ Verification Process. Conflict of interest

8 Verification Process. Risk Analysis and Verification Plan. Verification Process

9_Verifier Tools

9_ Verification Plan and Risk Analysis

9_USA-Canada Risks. Government Risk Evaluation in Alberta, Canada

10 GIZ Verification Process. Findings and Report

10_ Verification Process. Verification Report. Non-Compliances Treatment

11_Case Study

Session 5 – Accreditation of GHG Verification Agencies. Accreditation processes in the USA and Canada

Session 6 – Verification Process. Strategic Analysis and CoI

Session 9 – Government Risk Evaluation in Alberta, Canada

With the approach of 2020 – the cut-off date for the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and its Aichi Targets – the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity of the United Nations began the process of developing a Global Framework for Biodiversity Post-2020, as another step towards completing the 2050 Vision of “Living in Harmony with Nature”.

As part of this process, the Mexican government, through the Chancellery, the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), and the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), held the “First Workshop in the process of identifying Mexico’s potential contributions to the Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework” to analyze and identify the country’s potential contributions to the negotiation process within this new framework, which will be adopted next October by the Fifteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 15) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Around 180 specialists from state and federal governments, academia, youth, the private sector, civil society, indigenous populations, and local communities participated in this workshop on the 29th and 30th of October, which sought a better understanding of the alarming situation and biodiversity trends, as well as the identification of the challenges and opportunities for building new global targets in conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of biodiversity for the period 2021-2030.

 

Credits: CONABIO. 180 specialists from varied sectors implemented recommendations for the Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.

During the workshop, GIZ facilitated the table “Searching for Sustainability on all Fronts,” where the main results from the Mainstreaming Biodiversity into the Mexican Agricultural Sector (IKI-IBA) were presented, and participants discussed the importance of including the productive sectors as allies in the strategies for sustainable use of biodiversity. Likewise, the Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) was in charge of the table “Mobilization of Resources,” where it presented the results of the work produced in coordination with the Mexican government between 2015 and 2018 for the Global Biodiversity Framework; in particular for “Mobilization of Resources” Aichi Target 20. What’s more, advances in the implementation of financing solutions for biodiversity were presented, as well as the support opportunities that BIOFIN can provide for the process post-2020.

 

In 2016, the region with the highest production of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) was the United States and Canada with 21 kg per capita. In Latin America, Mexico positioned itself as the second producer of WEEE with 8.2 kg per inhabitant. Of the total number of WEEE generated, it is estimated that, in Mexico, only 10% is formally recycled, 40% remain stored, while the remaining 50% is disposed of in landfills or uncontrolled dumpsites. Due to factors such as the current consumption scheme, the lack of repair culture and the short innovation cycles, it is expected that, in the absence of relevant measures, the production of WEEE will increase exponentially globally.

The incorrect management and poor disposition of WEEE causes negative impacts on environmental, economic and public health aspects. For this reason, in the Sustainable Development Goals, WEEE has been identified as a priority action issue. Specifically, it has been detected that this issue has participation in SDGs 3 Good Health and Well-being, 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth, 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities and 12 Responsible Consumption and Production.

With the objective of understanding the serious problem that represents the production of WEEE in Mexico and its possible areas of improvement, a study was developed on the sustainable consumption and recycling of these wastes where the WEEE management schemes in Mexico and Germany were analyzed, and allowed to identify the differences and areas of opportunities. This study is aligned to the activities of the German Mexican Alliance for Climate Change project of the German Cooperation for Sustainable Development (GIZ),

Within the results of the study, there is very relevant information that allows to know how the scheme of recycling and sustainable consumption of these products is managed in Mexico and Germany; it indicated for example, that in Germany the management of this type of waste is carried out under the concept of extended responsibility, while in Mexico the shared responsibility scheme is used. In the first scheme, the responsibility of WEEE management is attributed to the manufacturers, while in the second one the responsibility is delegated to producers, importers, exporters, marketers, consumers, recyclers and authorities alike. With the application of this last management scheme, the adequate management of WEEE is indirectly discouraged, since specific obligations are not assigned to the actors.

Additionally, the study shows the operation of Mexican regulations regarding the characterization of WEEE as special handling waste, with which states and municipalities are responsible for their management and disposal through the creation of management plans. However, there are some states that do not have management plans and there is a great disparity between existing plans. This creates difficulties for the logistics chain responsible for the proper management of WEEE, as companies must adjust to each management plan separately.

Derived from these and other quite interesting results, the study shows a series of recommendations in the short, medium and long term. Among these suggestions are:

 

 

Download the study for more details on how the mechanisms of consumption and recycling of these devices work in both countries.

Palm oil has been a controversial crop in the world due to its establishment through bad practices carried out especially in Southeast Asia, which has triggered multiple socio-environmental problems. In Mexico it is a relatively young crop, with 96 thousand hectares of plantations mostly under 25 years, however, it generates an important economic spill in municipalities with high marginalization, providing 25 thousand direct jobs and 77 thousand indirect jobs in four States of the southeast of Mexico. 75% of the national production of palm oil fruits is in the hands of small producers in Tabasco, Chiapas, Campeche and southern Veracruz. For these producers it is imperative to achieve sustainable production, as required by the current market, and that allows them to conserve the ecosystem services on which their way of life depends.

The IKI IBA Project in 2018 and 2019 accompanied the process of national interpretation of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil RSPO Principles and Criteria, which seek to promote the certification of environmental and social sustainability of Mexican palm oil. In addition, a collaboration with the Mexican Federation of Palm Oil was initiated (Femexpalma) to develop a training plan under the approach of sustainability certification schemes, which promotes the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity in the sector, and that mainly provides small producers with the tools they need for the implementation of sustainable practices.

On November 28, a workshop to detect training needs in the sector was held in Villahermosa, Tabasco, with key actors that included producers, directors of mining companies, academics and sustainability directors, where the current status of competencies in the oil palm system was discussed, the problems faced by the sector to achieve RSPO certification were identified and a map of actors that should be involved with the training plan was developed.

 

Within the framework of capacity strengthening in the subnational area, the global program “Financing Energy for Low-carbon Investment Cities Advisory Facility” (FELICITY) in collaboration with the “Program for Energy Efficiency in Buildings” (PEEB) and the consulting firm ECOLONER, held a training workshop in Mexico City to present to the political and financial leaders the benefits and the financing and tangible options in the transformation of the building sector.

The workshop took place on October 17, 2019 at Quinta Colorada, located in Bosque de Chapultepec in Mexico City, with a total of 39 participants, 19 women and 20 men, who were representing different federal agencies, like the Ministry of Environment (SEDEMA), Single Housing Registry (RUV), Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), Ministry of Agrarian, Territorial and Urban Development (SEDATU), Electric Transportation Service (STE), Ministry of Inclusion and Social Welfare (SIBISO), National Housing Commission (CONAVI), Public Works and Services Department of the CDMX (SOBSE), Collective Transportation System Metro (STC), Ministry of Health of Mexico City (SEDESA), Federal Mortgage Society (SHF) and Energy Savings Trust (FIDE), as well as representatives of different municipalities of Mexico City.

 

Credits: Miguel Ángel Fernández, FELICITY GIZ. Representatives of the dependencies and municipalities of the GCDMX.

 

The welcome and introduction of the workshop was given by Itzel Alcérreca, Advisor to the Global FELICITY Project, who gave an overview on the German Cooperation for Sustainable Development (GIZ) and its work in Mexico, as well as its programs, main themes and global projects, concluding with an explanation about the FELICITY program and its relation to this workshop.

Likewise, Liliana Campos, PEEB technical advisor presented her program and main objectives, such as reducing the energy demand for the construction sector to a minimum level and encouraging investments in energy efficient buildings.

The workshop was led by Manuel de Diego Olmedo, representing the Econoler consultancy, who has more than 25 years of experience in consulting for energy efficiency and clean energy projects, both in the private and public sectors. His presentation covered the foundations for the financing of energy efficiency in buildings, the challenges to finance energy efficiency in buildings, large-scale policies, key financial indicators, as well as international financing options and funds.

 

Credits: Miguel Ángel Fernández, FELICITY GIZ. Manuel de Diego Olmedo, Econoler consultant, during his presentation at the Workshop on Financing Energy Efficiency in Buildings.

 

There was also the participation of Ismael Díaz, an independent consultant in public policies and international finance, who gave a presentation and a series of exercises on Finance for non-financiers.

Finally, to conclude the workshop, an evaluation of the training was carried out by the attendees where satisfactory results were obtained.

Linking climate finance and leveraging private investments for energy efficiency in buildings is the key to achieving the objectives of the Paris Agreement.

FELICITY is the initiative implemented by GIZ; with the support of the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) of Germany that provides technical assistance in the preparation of projects focused on low carbon infrastructure in cities.

For more information, see the GIZ- FELICITY and PEEB sites.

This new report of the Programme for Energy Efficiency in Buildings (PEEB) is a piece of thought and a practical guide for construction professionals. It is based on current literature and interviews with 28 subject matter experts from around the world. It also shows how digital solutions can support the transition to more energy-efficient buildings, and points out the limitations and gaps that exist.

Land degradation and desertification present great challenges for human development worldwide. It is crucial to ensure the continued provision of ecosystem services related to soil conservation, such as moderation of extreme events, prevention of erosion and maintenance of fertility to meet the needs of the growing number of inhabitants of the planet. Land degradation nowadays costs more than 10% of the annual global GDP in lost ecosystem services, such as the prevention of runoff from harmful nutrients to streams or the reduction of flood effects (IPBES 2018). This is why the Project IKI IBA, in association with the Economics of Land Degradation (ELD) Initiative, agreed to carry out joint actions to boost the training of key actors in the methodology of economic valuation of the impact of land degradation, so that this information contributes with inputs to the planning and decision-making instruments in Mexico.

 

 

Credits: IKI-IBA project. View of La Providencia nanobasin, in the Mixteca, where the IKI-IBA Project supports soil erosion prevention activities.

 

Between October 28 and November 7, training was conducted on the ELD methodology for the economic valuation of soil degradation, in the cities of Oaxaca and CDMX: one for professional experts, resource managers and decision makers, and another aimed at experts with strong competencies in environmental economics. During these activities, the best options were discussed and potential partners were detected for a study of economic valuation of land degradation, highlighting the state of Oaxaca as the site with the greatest amount of base information for the Mixteca region.

 

Credits: IKI-IBA project. In the workshops NGOs, academics, and representatives of federal and state government participated.

 

Based on the results of these workshops, a collaboration proposal will be made with the government of the state of Oaxaca, so that the recommendations obtained from a potential economic valuation study of the Mixteca soils can be incorporated in the best way to the decision of management of the territory.

The ELD initiative, which is funded by BMZ, is an international collaboration that performs a global assessment of land degradation from an economic perspective. The IKI IBA Project will continue to collaborate with this initiative to achieve its objectives.

GIZ, the Municipal Government of Hermosillo through the Municipal Institute of Urban Planning and Public Space (IMPLAN) and the Mexican company CAFFENIO launched a call to present a comprehensive project for the construction of a new point of sale.

The awards took place on December  of this year, where the director of IMPLAN, Guadalupe Peñúñuri Soto, and directors of the Caffenio company presented the National Green Infrastructure Award. The Municipal Government of Hermosillo was thanked for the advances in the task to make the municipality a more sustainable place.

In this sense, the first place was for the team conformed by Glenda Angélica Saucedo Cajigas and Alejandro Armenta Tresviño, from Hermosillo, who presented a project with the following proposals: rain garden, green wall for terrace shading, replacement of simple permeable concrete with filter layer and absorption wells. It also has grass with filter layer, bike rack with special design, waste separation containers, solar domes for indoor spaces, free electric charger when applying Telsa Charging Partner and a single to double glass replacement.

The second place was obtaine by Jesús Octavio González Martínez, Martha Leticia Kawano Miranda, María Guadalupe Salomón López, Mariana Sau Galindo and Alexis Uriel Valenzuela Zazueta, also from Hermosillo. And the third place was obtained by Idalia Alejandra Estrada González, Gabriela Maldonado Enriquez and Leonardo Arturo Beneditt Jiménez from Monterrey, Nuevo León.

In the event, the General Director of Caffenio, José Antonio Díaz and the Planning and Sustainability Manager, Verenice Acedo Ruíz, applauded the initiative and argued that it was a joint learning process. They also thanked the 65 teams formed by 109 people who participated and congratulated the three winning teams.